why the Constitution
FOR A COPY OF THE COMIC PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION DISCUSSED BELOW: COMIC COLOR COMIC B&W
The concept behind the Constitution is that 13 states decided to work together to declare independence from Britain. Although the Revolutionary War ended in 1783, it was not until September 17, 1787 that the Constitution was adopted. The goal of the document is to provide a basis upon which a small Federal Government would be given certain very specific jobs requiring a centralized approach, while the States would remain essentially independent. This is a form of government called a Republic.
The Civil War should never have been fought, in my opinion. By the very concept behind creating the Republic, any State should have the right to dissolve its relationship with the Republic. But the war was fought and the only ones who won were the International Banking Cartel (who were undeniably complicit in fueling the Civil War) . The financial ruin resulting from the war allowed a massive opening for International Bankers to gain control of the nation.
It happened with the Act of 1871, passed unconstitutionally by the Forty-first Congress. The District of Columbia would hence forth be governed by a private corporation. This new governing body was designated THE UNITED STATES which is in reality a corporation! And who owns it? In return for loaning money to bail out the bankrupt nation, the International Bankers got to own the corporation running D.C.!
That corporation adopted a statement of basic principles by which it would operate. That document was called THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. In the Preamble of the Republic’s Constitution it is called The Constitution for the United States. The corporate constitution must by law be capitalized because it indicates a business document. “Of” has replaced “for”. The term "OF" means "belonging to" as in "property of," and "FOR" means "on behalf of."
To the individual this abomination has resulted not in absolute rights guaranteed by the Republic Constitution but by relative rights. An absolute right is the right to be free to do anything that does not hurt someone else. A relative right entails you have to be given permission to have a specific right. Absolute right to drive a car anywhere. A relative right to drive a car with a license. Absolute right to conduct business with anyone. A relative right to conduct business requires numerous licenses and regulations. Absolute right to own property. Relative right to own property only if you pay taxes (i.e. rent) to a government. Taxes, licenses, and fines indicate you do not have Absolute Rights.
Under the Republic an individual is considered a “sovereign” being which means independent and holding a superior position to all others. Under the Corporation the corporation is the supreme of everything. Individuals are actually considered corporate assets!
A "DUNS number" is given to a single business entity. The DUNS number 16-190-6193 has a company name “Government Of The United States”, also known as “U S Government”. The mailing address is “The U S Capitol, Washington, DC, USA”. The Executives are listed as “Barack H Obama - President” and “Mr Joseph R Biden - Vice President”. The Line of Business is “United States Federal Government”. Interestingly the Year Established is given as the date the original Constitution was adopted 1787.
Continual Supreme Court decisions have confirmed the Federal Government is a corporation and Maritime Law can be used in virtually any legal case brought by the Federal Government. The most recent critical decision was the January 2010 decision on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission where corporation spending on elections was not limited. Common interpretation has become that a corporation is a “person”. This just reaffirms the dogma of a corporation being superior to any individual.
The key to understanding this change to Maritime Law is that Maritime Law is focused on commerce. By expanding ocean based commerce to include land based commerce, Maritime Law is allowed to stand. Admiralty/Maritime Law protects the corporation not the individual. In the Admiralty setting in a court of law, the Republic Constitution does not apply. Don’t bother to cite your Bill of Rights.
In bankruptcy a person or corporations assets are ceased by creditors. The creditors in this case are International Bankers. And as the corporation the UNITED STATES presented the case they owned everyone and everything within its jurisdiction, the President of the United States (Chief Executor of the Corporation) declared a National Emergency on March 9, 1933. Their intent was to confiscate all the gold held by all Americans.
The legal maneuver to do this was to make an amendment to the War Powers Act of 1917 with World War I on going. President Wilson signed the Act to prevent the trading with any enemy by requiring licensing. The Act stipulated this did not apply to any U.S. citizen. The FDR Amendment ["Section 2. Subdivision (b) of section 5 of the Act of October 6, 1917, (40 Stat. L. 411)] stated the President could declare an emergency and use any agency of the Federal Government to insure that no “export, hoarding, melting, or earmarking of gold or silver coin or bullion or currency, BY ANY PERSON WITHIN THE UNITED STATES OR ANY PLACE SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF.”
With the War Powers Act the concept of Declaring an Emergency comes about. This just awful law requires the Constitution (either one) be set aside. There is no Constitution in operation under a declared Emergency. Without the Constitution there is nothing to limit the powers of the Federal Government. After declaring the emergency, FDR confiscated the gold. A huge fine of $10,000 could be levied against anyone hoarding gold. For each troy ounce a citizen turned in they would get $20.67. When all the gold was controlled by the Federal Government including its exchange rate, the price of gold rose to $35. Cool move, hey?
What they determined is some 470 statutes normally under the jurisdiction of the Congress were moved to the province of the President under Emergency Acts still in effect. There were the two Nixon, one Truman for the Korean War and the 1933 FDR Emergency Decree. To quote the report, “This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal constitutional processes.”
The first process in the investigation was to determine what statutes existed because of the Emergency Decrees. The following provides great insight into the enormity of just that problem: “Nowhere in the Government, in either the Executive or Legislative branches, did there exist a complete catalog of all emergency statutes. Many were aware that there had been a delegation of an enormous amount of power but, of how much power, no one knew.”
The report concludes in part that the nation in 1973 found itself in, “...the present phenomenon of a permanent state of national emergency.” The report goes on to explain in historical terms how this all transpired.
The Wilson 1917 war powers had been relinquished by the President at the close of hostilities. They noted Wilson’s War Powers Act was designed only for wartime. With Roosevelt the concept of “emergency” was expanded to include the Great Depression. From the Senate Report:
Beginning with F.D.R., then, extensive use of delegated powers exercised under an aura of crisis has become a dominant aspect of the presidency.
Over the course of at least the last 40 years, then, Presidents have had available an enormous - seemingly expanding and never-ending - range of emergency powers.
Because Congress and the public are unaware of the extent of emergency powers, there has never been any notable congressional or public objection made to this state of affairs. Nor have the courts imposed significant limitations.
What these examples suggest and what the magnitude of emergency powers affirm is that most of these laws do not provide for congressional oversight or termination. There are two reasons which can be adduced as to why this is so. First, few, if any, foresaw that the temporary states of emergency declared in 1938, 1939, 1941, 1950, 1970, and 1971 would become what are now regarded collectively as virtually permanent states of emergency...Second the various administrations who drafted these laws for a variety of reasons were understandably not concerned about providing for congressional review, oversight, or termination of these delegated power's which gave the President enormous powers and flexibility to use those powers.
Now the 1973 Senate Report says the basic reason for this continued state of emergency was the Cold War, “In the view of the Special Committee, an emergency does not now exist. Congress, therefore, should act in the near future to terminate officially the states of national emergency now in effect.”
But then they gave all sorts of reasons why access to such emergency powers should exist. But this time they specified that Congress had to have oversight and procedures for terminating those powers. But they also left it to future Senators to accomplish this task. To my knowledge the subject has not been dealt with and we are still operating under a 1933 Emergency Decree.
So predominate proof indicates the Federal Government is a corporation. Well what does the US CODE say? TITLE 28 PART VI CHAPTER 176 SUBCHAPTER A > § 3002 states:
(15) “United States” means--
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
So we have a corporation running things and have been under Emergency Decree since 1933. So what if that entails you get a driver license or be required to have a Social Security Number to work in the United States (both started in 1933). Otherwise all is well, right? Well I guess so if you are feeling economically secure. For the rest of us we are in a state of constant fear.
After the gold was confiscated and given to the bankers following the 1933 bankruptcy, the only way to do business was to go to the banks controlling the money and get a loan. A car company may have cars to use as collateral. In 1933 State Governments used the citizens of the state as collateral. 48 governors pledged the “full faith and credit” of their state that included their citizens as collateral for Federal Reserve System loans.
To track the collateral assets, birth certificates are used. Doctors who are allowed to operate in “relative freedom” by having a license, are required to sign a birth certificate. That original certificate is sent to the Secretary of State with jurisdiction. The State sends a certified copy to the U.S. Department of Commerce that makes another certified copy. That second copy goes to the International Monetary Fund in Brussels, Belgium. The birth certificates are then used as collateral by the UNITED STATES to secure loans from the IMF.
In addition, the birth certificates within the financial community are considered “equity securities” that mature on the 18th birthday of the person who’s name appears on the certificate. The red numbers printed in red at the bottom of every birth certificate are a security stock exchange number. The birth certificate is printed on security paper with the statement that it is not to be accepted if no on full color security paper. Oh, yes, it is a document not to prove you were born, but to prove you are an asset of finance.
Perhaps you do not care about this issue. Does not seem to apply to your life. Well in allowing your child to be registered with the State by the executing of a birth certificate, you have essentially given your child over to the State. That is the source of a State’s right to take your child away from you. They own the child. The birth certificated child has become an asset of a trust and his/her social security number allows for the tracking of the asset within the trust. Puts a new spin on “Human Resources”, doesn’t it?
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
BIRTH CERTIFICATES SEE:
ON THE FED AND PUBLIC BANKING SEE: CLICK
FOR MORE BY Nancy L Hopkins: http://www.cosmicreality.net/